Cash for Clunkers..The real math

Here is what a friend had to say about "Cash for Clunkers". Ignore all the gas savings and just look at how the car buyer got taken to the cleaners.

If you traded in a clunker worth $3500, you get $4500 off for an apparent "savings" of $1000. However, you have to pay taxes on the $4500 come April 15th (something that no auto dealer would tell you). If you are in the 30% tax bracket, you will pay $1350 on that $4500. So, rather than save $1000, you actually pay an extra $350 to the feds.

In addition, you traded in a car that was most likely paid for. Now you have 4 or 5 years of payments on a car that you did not need, that was costing you less to run than the payments that you will now be making. But wait, it gets even better: they also got ripped off by the dealer.

For example, every dealer in LA was selling the Ford Focus with all the goodies including A/C, auto transmission, power windows, etc for $12,500 the month before the "cash for clunkers" program started. When "cash for clunkers" came along, they stopped discounting them and instead sold them at the list price of $15,500.

So, you paid $3000 more than you would have the month before. (Honda, Toyota, and Kia played the same list price game that Ford and Chevy did). So lets do the final tally here: You traded in a car worth: $3500 You got a discount of: $4500 Net so far +$1000 But you have to pay: $1350 in taxes on the $4500 Net so far: -$350 And you paid: $3000 more than the car was selling for the month before Net -$3350 We could also add in the additional taxes (sales tax, state tax, etc.) on the extra $3000 that you paid for the car, along with the 5 years of interest on the car loan but lets just stop here.

Who actually made out on the deal? The feds collected taxes on the car along with taxes on the $4500 they "gave" the buyer. The car dealers made an extra $3000 or more on every car they sold along with the kickbacks from the manufacturers and the loan companies. The manufacturers got to dump lots of cars they could not give away the month before. And the poor consumer got saddled with even more debt that many cannot afford.

Congress convinced Joe consumer that he was getting $4500 in "free" money from the "government" when in fact Joe was giving away his $3500 car and paying an additional $3350 for the privilege.

When we look at all the numbers it looks as only a few reaped the benefits from the Cash for Clunkers program. We never really get anything for free!

Later...
Scott
http://www.fdipays.com/

Can you save $16,000.00 per month?

This is a trick question, but when you realize the outcome can become one of the same you will understand why passive income generates considerable wealth.

POP Quiz

Q: How much money would you need to save every month, over the
next 5 years, to save $1 million?

A) $160
B) $1,600
C) $16,000
D) $160,000



Answer: C

“Can you save $16,000 every month?”

That’s $16,000 a month after you pay for food, gas, utilities, credit cards. After you pay your mortgage or rent, car payment, insurance, ect.


The $1 Million you saved would give you a royalty income of $5000 a month ($60,000 a year). Whether you went to work or not, you’d get the money.


Here’s the good news. Some people have found an easier way to create $5000 a month ($60,000 a year) in royalty or passive residual income.

So, is your money working for you, or are you working for your money?

To your success,
Scott
www.fdipays.com